Constitutional text
(1) The President may by order appoint a Commission consisting of such persons as he thinks fit to investigate the conditions of socially and educationally backward classes within the territory of India and the difficulties under which they labour and to make recommendations as to the steps that should be taken by the Union or any State to remove such difficulties and to improve their conditions and as to the grants that should be made for the purpose by the Union or any State and the conditions subject to which such grants should be made, and the order appointing such Commission shall define the procedure to be followed by the Commission.
Source: Constitution of India, as published by the Ministry of Law and Justice.
History and context
Article 340 was used to constitute the First Backward Classes Commission (Kaka Kalelkar Commission, 1953) and the Second Backward Classes Commission (Mandal Commission, 1979). The Mandal Commission's recommendation of 27% reservation for Other Backward Classes in central government jobs, implemented in 1990 by Prime Minister V. P. Singh, triggered the most divisive political upheaval since the Emergency.
Key Supreme Court cases
Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (Mandal case) (1992)
Upheld 27% OBC reservation as constitutional; capped total reservation at 50%; excluded the creamy layer; held reservations in promotions were not covered by Article 16(4).
Related articles
Last reviewed: 3 July 2026